Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Essential Space Travel Documentaries

Much of what I know about space exploration has at least had its inspiration in the various documentaries and TV programs I've watched over the years. Of course, one has to go further and actually read the books upon which a lot of these are based, but if you are (like me) a bit lazy, these are the essential, accurate and enjoyable films about human space travel.

Core Curriculum

For All Mankind (Reinert, 1989)

The original “wow” Apollo documentary from 1989 sets the tone for the modern incarnation of a space flight film. What made it special was that it was the first movie to really present the footage shot on the Apollo (and Gemini) missions in beautiful, speed-corrected, motion-stabilized large-format film. Director Al Reinert (a magazine writer originally) encourages us to simply regard much of this material and contemplate its beauty and magnificence. There’s no narration, and instead the soundtrack is compiled from hours of interviews with the astronauts, some of who are ruminating for the first time on the spiritual significance of their experience. But above all, the selling point of this film is the music, by Brian Eno and Daniel Lanois. If it seems familiar, it’s because hundreds of shows over the years have re-used bits of it to milk some of its haunting, lyrical quality. The associated album, Apollo: Atmospheres and Soundtracks, is a must-hear for anyone interested in ambient music.


This covers much the same grounds as For All Mankind, but seen through British eyes (this is a UK documentary), it comes out as less “lump in the throat/hand on the heart” grandstanding and more of cool, human professionals having the adventure of their lives. Interviews with the astronauts as old men are tremendously affecting, and the film takes time to explore what they’ve done with their lives after the moon. (Some may surprise you.) It even finds time at the end to address this ridiculous and insulting “moon landing hoax” nonsense.

When We Left Earth (Discovery Channel 2008)

The NASA-approved history, complete with pounding, soaring patriotic music and sonorous voice-over. What lifts this series above the pack is the beautifully re-mastered high definition images of the space missions (these images have never looked better) and some current interviews with the astronauts left out of In the Shadow of the Moon. It’s also expansive in a way the others aren’t. This film tells the whole story, from Mercury through to the ISS, although it gets the future wrong by parroting the Project Constellation line, a forgivable offense for the time.

Space Shuttle Disaster” (PBS NOVA 2009)

Honest, frank and not at all NASA-approved, this one-hour NOVA episode is really all you need to hear about the Space Shuttle. Pay close attention to Story Musgrave, one of my favourite astronauts, and one of the most outspoken.



Advanced Study


If you’re into retro-documentaries, this is a good one. Epitomizing everything about a certain kind of film in 1969, this is slightly pretentious, arty, self-aware, thunder-voiced documentary at its best. (It starts with a shot of Stonehenge and proceeds to ruminate on the significance of the moon. Yes, it’s that kind of film.) But, it does have “first day” priority, in the sense that it was made at the time of Apollo 11 and to be fair, the filmmaker was told to make it a “time capsule” of everything about the Apollo experience as it was happening.  Much of what was shot for this film was re-used in For All Mankind to different effect.

Moon Machines” Series (Science Channel 2008)

If you’d like to go deeper into the engineering and manufacturing side of Apollo, here’s your chance. Some of these men (and women) have funny, dramatic and moving stories tell about building the engines, the capsules, the clothing, the computers and all the other equipment that got Apollo to the moon. Think of it as the “inside out” version of NASA history, from the perspective of people who have probably never been asked about it before.

The Red Stuff (De Boer 2000)

A Dutch documentary about the Soviet space program does some of what In the Shadow of the Moon does for that part of space history. You get interviews with many of the important surviving cosmonauts (including a gregarious Pavel Popovich and a tough, unrepentant Gherman Titov), but little real sense of the history of the program. For otherwise informed viewers, this isn’t a problem, but for the uninitiated there will probably be some confusion.


The Russian Right Stuff” (PBS NOVA 1991)

Made just as the Soviet Union was collapsing in the 1989-1990, this is a key bit of space history that’s fallen out of print. (I have an old video tape from 1991 which has my own off-air copy of it.) Narrated by Sgt Stedenko himself, Stacey Keach, this three-part series is largely based on James Oberg’s Red Star in Orbit, revised with new information that came to light after the fall of the Soviet Union. It features Alexi Leonov prominently and follows him through his major post-space activity: designing and running the definitive cosmonaut school in Star City, Russia. (Though Leonov has since moved on, the school is running strong and even training the recent crop of space tourists.) It also features the late Vasili Mishin, whose recollections of the disastrous Russian moon program of the 1960s and 1970s form the key narrative of the middle episode, “The Dark Side of the Moon”.  This film is part of my basic understanding of manned space history, although we know much more now and in retrospect. (For example, Mishin and Leonov are both biased, unreliable historical witnesses, and we now have detailed records of the then-mysterious N1 moon rocket.)

Astrospies” (PBS NOVA 2008)

This recent NOVA episode was a bit of a revelation for me, as I always knew about the MOL (Manned Orbiting Laboratory) program and the Almaz program, but I never put the two together. Much of what’s presented here about these military space stations is newly declassified and quite fascinating, especially to hear from the astronauts and cosmonauts who trained for, and, in the case of the cosmonauts, flew these missions of space espionage. In fact, plans called for much more than espionage, and the Soviet station even featured a machine gun, which was indeed fired in space, a rather “mixed” space legacy to say the least!

Saturday, July 16, 2011

Your Vacation: Space Travel Destinations

If you're planning a summer vacation, these destinations won't steer you too wrong. (Although, the international space station is a bit of a stretch on your budget.)

I visited the Kennedy Space Centre when I was 9 years old (even then I wondered where the shuttle went). One of my main memories of that trip is seeing a guy in a space suit, walking around the centre, posing for photos. Now, looking back, I'm sure that fellow was secretly saying, "I've been wearing a diaper all day - this job sucks!"

Click here for the 11 coolest space travel destinations this year.

Friday, July 15, 2011

Obama Calls the Astronauts

As part of the activities around STS-135 (the last shuttle mission), President Obama called the space station today to re-affirm America's role in space. You can read the whole story on Space.com right here.

American Presidents are always caught between a rock and hard place with regards to the space program. Most of what any President promises in his (or someday her) term won't be realized until long after they're out of office, when it comes to space. That makes any space-related initiatives or long-term missions not particularly valuable politically.

Every now and then you get a leader like Kennedy (or, in my home country of Canada, someone like Trudeau or MacDonald) will dream beyond the immediate future and spend some of their political capital on big, visionary challenges for their nation. In other words, space requires political courage.

Both Democrats and Republicans have alternatively supported and withdrawn support for space exploration. It doesn't seem to me to be a left-right political issue, but more an issue of political expediency. Presidents love coming out with big visions for space (Bush the first did it, Bush the second did it), but then the next president comes along and pulls the plug. They always claim to have their reasons, but it's like trying to drive from Montreal to Vancouver, changing drivers, routes and cars every two hours, and having a debate about whether you should make the trip at all.

Democracy can be frustrating sometimes for large programs with little political return. Maybe that's one of the reasons why the Soviets (and now the Chinese) did so well.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Dragon in Space

Here's another invaluable space link, Dragon in Space, a look at the Chinese space efforts. It's not linked to the Chinese government (actually an offshoot of a UK website), and it has news on China's ambitious 2011 space schedule.

Space Cartoon of the Day/Week/Month/Whenever I Find One

This is a brilliant bit of penetrating satire that speaks exactly to my earlier post on the space shuttle.

(One objection I'd make is to point out that the Chinese wouldn't be silly enough to invest in a shuttle system with nothing to shuttle to. And no one in their right mind would use the shuttle design again. Notice how no one is?)




Enjoy!

James Webb and Telescopes

This morning I noticed this story over at Space.com:

Scientists Condemn Plans to Scrap Hubble Telescope Successor | James Webb Space Telescope | NASA Budget & Congress | Space.com

The James Webb Space Telescope is expensive, absolutely, and it's over budget and behind schedule, just like Hubble was. In fact, does anyone remember how much trouble Hubble was? Three shuttle missions, millions of dollars and countless hours of hair-pulling on the part of the scientists who designed it and all we got was a look into the deepest regions of space and the origin of the universe.

It all makes me sigh wearily, because this is a problem that the space program has faced since it's earliest days: funding. It really reminds me of my "other life" as a film historian, because so much of that history consists of people begging for money, slapping backs and making compromises to get the job done.

The analogy is even more apt when you consider that the public's attitude to both activities is more or less the same: pretty, but unnecessary. The fact is that visionaries have a hard time getting businesspeople and politicians to invest in their dreams, particularly when there's no obvious commercial aspect to them. I will always argue strongly that every penny spent on the space program is worth it for what it contributes to the development of our species. But that's not a fashionable opinion, nor does it win the day in Congress.

The irony of this whole situation is that the telescope in question is named after James Webb, the administrator of NASA from 1961 to 1968. Webb is described in Tom Wolfe's The Right Stuff as an "off the ballot politician". Documentary footage of him show is a jowly bulldog of a man with slicked back hair looking like Jimmy Hoffa. His reputation is that of an old-fashioned, pre-Kennedy political operator. He was a dealmaker, a lobbyist. He knew what hands to shake and what backs to slap to remind a typically amnesiac Congress that they agreed to send men to the moon by the end of the decade. He also, in Andrew Chaykin's words from his A Man on the Moon, "knew where the political bodies were buried".

In other words, James Webb would be just the man to save the telescope that carries his name.

It's a stark reminder that in space exploration (like in film), you need creative, daring people who doggedly pursue their dreams, but you also need fast-talking powerful friends (in a film this would be a sympathetic producer) like James Webb to make sure things happen. Otherwise, in the words of filmmaker James Cameron, the "nattering nabobs of negativity" will win the day.

Monday, July 11, 2011

Essential Space Links

If you're crawling through the internet looking for some reliable information about space, it's easy to get lost. Without resorting to wikipedia (which isn't bad for a quick reference), here are some sites I use.

Encyclopedia Astronautica - Extremely comprehensive site with everything you'd want to know about space history. (NOTE: This site has just been taken down by its publisher. That's a real shame, and a great loss.)

NASA History Publications - You can find complete books here (in pdf or html format), including Asif Siddiqi's essential "Challenge to Apollo", a history of the Soviet space program in the 1960s.

James Oberg's Pioneering Space - Thoughtful, informed information from an acknowledged expert.

Space.com - For all the latest news and some useful links to boot.